In the case of
Creech v. Piotr F. Zembrzuski, No. 2024-CV-9004 (C.P. Lacka. Co. July 21, 2025, Nealon, J.), the court overruled Preliminary Objections filed against a medical malpractice Complaint in a wrongful death litigation.
According to the Opinion, a mother commenced this lawsuit against various healthcare providers for treating her daughter. The mother alleges that the healthcare providers failed to timely and properly diagnose the Plaintiff’s decedent’s deteriorating medical conditions.
According to the Opinion, the Plaintiff-mother asserted, among other claims, that the healthcare providers failed to timely and appropriate document the daughter’s findings and that their violation of the medical records documentation obligation prevented the mother from identifying in the Complaint each hospital agent who allegedly negligently treated the daughter.
The hospital Defendants filed a demurrer to the medical record charting allegations on the ground that the mother did not cite any statute, regulation, or other law that was allegedly violated or that supported the imposition of civil liability for untimely or inadequate medical entries.
The medical providers also sought to dismiss one hospital Defendant on the basis that it was merely a holding company which cannot be liable unless the mother pierced the corporate veil.
The court overruled the Preliminary Objections.
Judge Nealon noted that, under Pennsylvania law, physicians are obligated to make timely entries in a patient’s medical record that accurately, legibly, and completely reflect specific information regarding patient evaluation and treatment. The court noted that those charting requirements have been recognized as establishing standards of care and conduct for physician.
Accordingly, the court found that the mother’s allegations related to the hospital Defendants’ alleged violations of those medical records documentation standards were relevant to the Plaintiff’s negligent claims.
With regard to the claim against the alleged holding company, the court ruled that the mother had specifically alleged that the alleged holding company owned and operated the subject hospitals, employed the physicians and other professionals who treated the decedent, and provided medical care and services to the decedent.
Under the standard of review that requires the court to accept the Plaintiff’s factual allegations as true, and which prohibits the hospital Defendants from presenting a speaking demurrer, the court held that the Defendant’s Preliminary Objections should be overruled.
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this
LINK.